DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR GORKECTION OF NAVAL REGOROS
701 §, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No.NR06908-13
22 November 2013
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to th
e provisions of 10 USC 1552.
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive
session, considered your application on
22 November 2013. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
all material submitte
applicable statutes,
considered the adviso
Program Manager Casua
d in support thereof, your naval record and
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
ry opinion furnished by the Survivor Benefit Plan
lty Assistance (PERS-13) of 30 Sept 2013, a copy
of which has already been provided to you. You had 30 days to respond
and failed to do so.
After careful and con
the Board found that
establish the existen
making this determina
scienticus consideration of the entire record,
the evidence submitted was insufficient to
ce of probable material error or injustice. In
tion, the Board substantially concurred with the
comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your
application has been
the panel will be fur
It is regretted that
denied. The names and votes of the members of
nished upon request.
the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decisi
or other matter not Pp
on upon submission of new and material evidence
reviously considered by the Board, In this
regard, it is algo important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches t
applying for a correc
> all official records. Consequently, when
tion of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Vo. Ngai
W. DEAN PFE F
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6936 13
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your deceased husband's naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11325-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Records, sitting in executive session, considered application on 13 November 2008. You honorable discharge certificate on 16 January 2005, expiration of your statutory service obligation. You he Marine characterized ned a reentry gible or is incomplete, y action ive duty as a ere issued an upon the le discharge arrant honorable.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6112 13
BA three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01792-06
In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Man e Corps, a copy of which is enclosed.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error o...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2475 13
R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, In addition, the Board considered the regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05607-08
DEPARTMENT BOARD FOR CORRECTION 2 NAVY A WASHINGTON DC This is in reference the applicati mMaval record pursuant to the provi | | IA three-member panel of the Board Records, sitting in executive/ sess application on 24 November 2008. injustice were reviewed in ac¢orda regulations and procedures applica Board. Documentary material ¢onsi regulations and policies. your ¥ 1 t After careful and conscientious c record, the Board found that the insufficient to establish the exi error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04401-02
Since you were disqualified for assignment to recruiting duty, your request for reenlistment was denied. The reenlistment code a~e..gned was an RE-3C. Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-3C r code when Headquarters Marine Corps believes that a restrictive reenlistment code is required and no other reenlistment code fits the circumstances of the case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10695 14
DErARIMWEMN! Ur the RAY T PAAR PARP FRM PFr Ee TION Ae NAN Se preompr 701 5, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100i ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Dear Master ‘
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10937 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4871 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...